Maya solved the problem. It was Maya who solved the problem.
The cleft version highlights or corrects the person, not just the event.
Sudedamosios dalys
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
Highlight the important part of a message with clefts, fronting, and emphatic do.
FOCUS = one part is lit; the rest is background.
Plain message:
Maya solved the problem.
│ choose what needs the light
▼
┌──────────── SPOTLIGHT SWITCHES ────────────┐
│ FRAME IT │
│ It was Maya who solved the problem. │
│ it = empty starter │
│ was Maya = spotlight slot │
│ who... = background link │
│ │
│ PREPARE → REVEAL │
│ What I need is a clear answer. │
│ What... = open slot; is... = answer │
│ │
│ MOVE IT FIRST │
│ That part I don’t understand. │
│ first words = “look here first” │
│ │
│ INSIST IT IS TRUE │
│ I do understand your point. │
│ do = truth stress, not an action here │
└────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Choose the message’s spotlight: frame it, move it first, or use do to stress that it is true.
Maya solved the problem. It was Maya who solved the problem.
The cleft version highlights or corrects the person, not just the event.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
It was yesterday that the results came out.
An it-cleft can focus a time expression.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
Was it Ben who called?
Cleft questions are useful when checking the focused information.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
It isn’t the price that bothers me.
A negative cleft often implies that something else is the real issue.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
What I need is a clear answer.
A wh-cleft lets you prepare the listener before giving the key point.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
Where we disagree is the budget.
Where-clefts can focus a point, area, or source of difference.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
What happened was that the server failed.
This frame is useful for explaining events, problems, or misunderstandings.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
All we did was ask a question.
All-clefts often reduce or defend the importance of an action.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
That part I don’t understand.
Object fronting is common when the topic is already clear in conversation.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
In the corner sat a small black cat.
This descriptive pattern is more common in storytelling or literary style.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
Never have I heard such a convincing explanation.
After fronted negative adverbs like never, use question-like auxiliary order.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
I do understand your point.
Emphatic do can reassure or soften disagreement.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
She does work hard.
Use does for third-person singular positive emphasis.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
We did send the report.
Use did to insist that a past action really happened.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
Do sit down.
This imperative use is polite or insistent depending on tone and context.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
The book that you lent me is excellent.
A relative clause identifies a noun; it does not create a cleft focus frame.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
It is the book that I need.
The cleft highlights the book in contrast with other possible things.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
She does can help.
Do cannot be used to emphasize a modal verb.
She really can help.
With modals, add an adverb like really or stress the modal in speech.
Skaitykite sakinį prasminėmis dalimis, o ne po vieną žodį.
Prisijunkite, kad tęstumėte