Maya solved the problem. It was Maya who solved the problem.
The cleft version highlights or corrects the person, not just the event.
Satzbausteine
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
Highlight the important part of a message with clefts, fronting, and emphatic do.
FOCUS = one part is lit; the rest is background.
Plain message:
Maya solved the problem.
│ choose what needs the light
▼
┌──────────── SPOTLIGHT SWITCHES ────────────┐
│ FRAME IT │
│ It was Maya who solved the problem. │
│ it = empty starter │
│ was Maya = spotlight slot │
│ who... = background link │
│ │
│ PREPARE → REVEAL │
│ What I need is a clear answer. │
│ What... = open slot; is... = answer │
│ │
│ MOVE IT FIRST │
│ That part I don’t understand. │
│ first words = “look here first” │
│ │
│ INSIST IT IS TRUE │
│ I do understand your point. │
│ do = truth stress, not an action here │
└────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Choose the message’s spotlight: frame it, move it first, or use do to stress that it is true.
Maya solved the problem. It was Maya who solved the problem.
The cleft version highlights or corrects the person, not just the event.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
It was yesterday that the results came out.
An it-cleft can focus a time expression.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
Was it Ben who called?
Cleft questions are useful when checking the focused information.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
It isn’t the price that bothers me.
A negative cleft often implies that something else is the real issue.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
What I need is a clear answer.
A wh-cleft lets you prepare the listener before giving the key point.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
Where we disagree is the budget.
Where-clefts can focus a point, area, or source of difference.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
What happened was that the server failed.
This frame is useful for explaining events, problems, or misunderstandings.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
All we did was ask a question.
All-clefts often reduce or defend the importance of an action.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
That part I don’t understand.
Object fronting is common when the topic is already clear in conversation.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
In the corner sat a small black cat.
This descriptive pattern is more common in storytelling or literary style.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
Never have I heard such a convincing explanation.
After fronted negative adverbs like never, use question-like auxiliary order.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
I do understand your point.
Emphatic do can reassure or soften disagreement.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
She does work hard.
Use does for third-person singular positive emphasis.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
We did send the report.
Use did to insist that a past action really happened.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
Do sit down.
This imperative use is polite or insistent depending on tone and context.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
The book that you lent me is excellent.
A relative clause identifies a noun; it does not create a cleft focus frame.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
It is the book that I need.
The cleft highlights the book in contrast with other possible things.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
She does can help.
Do cannot be used to emphasize a modal verb.
She really can help.
With modals, add an adverb like really or stress the modal in speech.
Lies den Satz in Sinneinheiten, nicht Wort für Wort.
Bitte melde dich an, um fortzufahren.