I saw a dog.
A dog is mentioned for the first time, so the listener cannot identify it yet.
Elementy składowe
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
Choose between indefinite, definite, and no article based on shared knowledge, countability, and specificity.
ARTICLE = listener logic: can they identify it?
Start with the noun:
1) one countable thing (one/two possible)
├─ new/not identified → a/an opens
│ I saw a dog.
└─ known/identified → the points
The dog was barking.
2) many things or uncountable stuff/idea
├─ general meaning → Ø (no article) widens
│ I like dogs.
│ Water is important.
└─ specific/identified → the points
The dogs next door bark at night.
The water in this bottle is cold.
Use a/an to introduce one countable thing, the when the listener can identify it, and no article for general many/stuff ideas.
I saw a dog.
A dog is mentioned for the first time, so the listener cannot identify it yet.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The dog was barking.
After the first mention, use the for the same dog.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
I like dogs.
Dogs means dogs in general, not a specific group.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
She is a doctor.
Singular countable job nouns normally need a determiner.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
I waited an hour.
Article choice follows sound, not spelling.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
She studies at a university.
University starts with a vowel letter but a consonant sound, so use a.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
We bought furniture.
Furniture is uncountable here, so do not use a.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
There’s a café on the corner.
A café is introduced as one café, not yet known to the listener.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The café opens at seven.
The refers back to the café introduced earlier.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
Where is the station?
The station means the relevant or expected station in that place.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
Dogs are friendly.
This means dogs as a category.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The dogs next door bark at night.
This is not about all dogs; it is about a known group of dogs.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
Water is important.
Water means water generally, not a specific amount.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The water in this bottle is cold.
The is used because the water is limited by in this bottle.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
Is there a pharmacy near here?
The speaker asks for any pharmacy, not a known pharmacy.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
I don’t have a car.
Negatives do not remove the need for a/an with singular count nouns.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
I bought new phone.
Phone is a singular count noun, so it needs a determiner.
I bought a new phone.
A new phone is the correct singular count noun phrase.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
I like the music.
This is only a mistake when the speaker means music in general.
I like music.
Music means music generally, so no article is used.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
Zaloguj się, aby kontynuować