I met a woman who speaks five languages.
A defining relative clause gives necessary information about a person.
Elementy składowe
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
Identify nouns or add extra information with who, which, that, whose, where, and comma use.
MENTAL MODEL
Which noun?
↓
[NOUN] + [link word] + [small statement about that noun]
↑
link word points back to the noun
link word choice:
who = person which/that = thing
whose = owner where = place
Needed to identify the noun → no commas
I met a woman who speaks five languages.
Extra comment only → commas around the clause
The museum, which opened last year, is free.
Put the noun first and attach the relative clause immediately after it; use commas only when the clause is extra information.
I met a woman who speaks five languages.
A defining relative clause gives necessary information about a person.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
She is the teacher who helped me.
Who is commonly used for people.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
This is the app that tracks my spending.
That is common in defining clauses for things.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
I don't want a job that takes all my weekends.
A negative main clause does not change the relative-clause pattern.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
Do you know the student whose bike was stolen?
Whose means belonging to someone or something.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
This is the cafe where we first met.
Where means in or at which for a place.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The jacket which you bought looks warm.
Which can identify a thing in a defining clause.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The man who called you is here.
When the relative word is the subject, it normally cannot be omitted.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The man you called is here.
In defining object relatives, the relative word is often left out.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The report we discussed was short.
Object relative omission also works with things.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
My brother who lives in Leeds is a nurse.
No commas mean the information is needed to identify the noun.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
My brother, who lives in Leeds, is a nurse.
Commas mark the relative clause as an extra note.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The museum, which opened last year, is free.
Use which, not that, in a non-defining clause about a thing.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The colleague I sent the file to replied quickly.
Prepositions often stay at the end in speech and neutral writing.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
The colleague to whom I sent the file replied quickly.
Moving the preposition before whom is formal.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
People wearing blue badges can enter first.
Some relative clauses can be shortened to adjective-like phrases.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
Where did we stay?
This is a direct question, not a relative clause.
I remember the hotel where we stayed.
Use statement word order inside a relative clause.
Zdanie warto czytać fragmentami, nie słowo po słowie.
I remember the hotel where did we stay.
This incorrectly uses question word order inside the relative clause.
Zaloguj się, aby kontynuować