Animacy / Humanness
Is the participant human, living, or non-living?
意味
A feature that can influence grammar depending on whether a participant is human, animate, animal, object, abstract, or respected.
見分け方
Notice whether people and living beings behave differently from objects in the sentence.
例
person|dog|tree|stone|idea
a person vs a thing|who vs what
I saw Maria at the station.
Visual guide
participant: Maria / dog / stone
|
animacy feature
human? animal? thing? idea?
|
grammar may change:
pronoun, object marker,
honorific, plural
same role: object of 'saw' I saw Maria. human I saw a dog. animate I saw a stone. thing Some languages: higher animacy -> extra marking lower animacy -> less/no marking who? vs what?
言語別ビュー
母語では
Japanese has no broad grammatical animacy system, but humanness affects counters, respect terms and person reference.
駅で田中さんを見た。
I saw Mr./Ms. Tanaka at the station.
学習中の言語では
Animacy and masculine-personal status affect case and plural agreement.
Widzę psa.
I-see dog-ANIM.
Learners miss why masculine objects sometimes look genitive.
Good transfer potential
This block behaves relatively similarly, so you can transfer intuition more safely between the two languages.